Apple II ?

[Lutherus]

Swapnil Bhartiya, osnivač Muktware je u članku za linuxadvocates.com iznio neke zabrinjavajuće tvrdnje.
Postaje li stvarno Canonical novi Apple?

http://www.linuxadvocates.com/2013/03/i ... ction.html

[jurastublic]

Apple IIc (canonical, compact, 0.5% tržišta).

[Suko]

Odličan tekst!

[Lutherus]

I will say nothing

[Grof]

Luth, mi smo svoje već odavno rekli.

Meni se više ne replicira samoga sebe

[Lutherus]

Ja razmišljam dal je došlo vrijeme da svoju 17 godina staru din cherry tipkovnicu zamjenim sa novom....

[shrike]

Ja ne kužim Lutherus, što te toliko opsjeda taj Ubuntu i Cannonical. Praktički u svakoj temi o bilo čemu tražiš poveznicu sa Appleizacijom ubuntua. Ono, znaš kaj vele o ljudima koji idu na net i namjerno traže stvari za koje znaju da će ih naljutiti

[4ndY]

S ovim se slažem i samo mi je to zapravo "problem" kod Ubuntua

At what cost?

Another serious problem is that Canonical has focused more on 'free in cost' than on freedom. From my interaction a majority of Ubuntu users don't seem to care much about about open source or freedom. Check out any OMG! Ubuntu thread on Photoshop and MS Word and you will find a majority of users simply want Photoshop or MS Word for Ubuntu.

What's the point of using Ubuntu when all you want is to run proprietary technology? Won’t it be easier to simply use WIndows? That was not bad, but it was concerning when I hear people ready to compromise their data and privacy to ‘support’ Canonical and let Canonical record keystrokes of their Dash search. That’s the kind of user-base Apple has created where people are told not to care about privacy, data ownership or telling Apple everything they do on their devices (through iTunes and iCloud).

[Lutherus]

Sori ljudi da uopće prenesem link sa neta za kojeg sam smatral da bi bil zanimljiv.

[shrike]

Nije poanta da nije zanimljiv, ali mi djeluje da previše opsjedaš sa time. I što onda ako cannonical postane novi apple? To je kao da se FreeBSD zajednica brine oko apple-a.